Caps94ZODG 01-06-2005, 08:32 AM looks like a Mitsu Galant or Stratus :(
thats sad it needs something like a black bar across the back..
AND IM NOT TALKING ABOUT THE 4 DOORS...looks like we have to live with a 4 door charger..its a nice car I like it though :D
rear shot
http://www.autoweek.com/files/specials/2005_detroit/dodge/charger/pages/D2006_003.htm
and I like the front it looks like a Dodge they always had funky front ends :D
http://www.autoweek.com/files/specials/2005_detroit/dodge/charger/pages/D2006_002.htm
guionM 01-06-2005, 09:24 AM Back looks OK to me. About the only thing I could possibly see changing are the tail lights to emphasize the round lenses inside and a 2005 GTO-ish black out rear bumper section.
Then again, this is a regular Charger R/T, not the Daytona or SRT-8. :)
jawzforlife 01-06-2005, 09:42 AM looks like a Mitsu Galant
Thats what I thought the 1st time I saw the 300
falchulk 01-06-2005, 09:48 AM I swear to god I love this car. I look at it and cannot figure out why people rip on it for being ugly.
OutsiderIROC-Z 01-06-2005, 10:14 AM 2 too many doors.
Mutiny32 01-06-2005, 01:33 PM I swear to god I love this car. I look at it and cannot figure out why people rip on it for being ugly.
Because it just isn't a Charger in any sense of the name.
91_z28_4me 01-06-2005, 01:38 PM Back looks OK to me. About the only thing I could possibly see changing are the tail lights to emphasize the round lenses inside and a 2005 GTO-ish black out rear bumper section.
Then again, this is a regular Charger R/T, not the Daytona or SRT-8. :)
I like how you slipped the Daytona in there without emphasising it. :p
guionM 01-06-2005, 01:39 PM I like how you slipped the Daytona in there without emphasising it. :p
Me too. ;)
killer-camaro 01-06-2005, 01:51 PM i like the front and the back. its the side i dont like. not even the whole side, just the two rear doors. i swear, if it were a 2 door i'd absolutely love it.
Brangeta 01-06-2005, 03:37 PM The tail lights are probably like that in effort to capture some of the Dodge Intrepid owners' attentions. They killed the Intrepid off in 2004, so they need to have a replacement, and the Charger is it.
Magnum Force 01-06-2005, 04:07 PM I swear to god I love this car. I look at it and cannot figure out why people rip on it for being ugly.
because (especially from the rear) it looks just like an updated intrepid
unvc92camarors 01-06-2005, 06:05 PM i think every rear of all the dcx cars need something
they bring out the 300 with a totally different approach to the front, put the same bland taillights on back
charger, bland t/ls
jeep liberty, bland
they need to have some sort of variation from car to car
Mutiny32 01-07-2005, 12:31 AM The tail lights are probably like that in effort to capture some of the Dodge Intrepid owners' attentions. They killed the Intrepid off in 2004, so they need to have a replacement, and the Charger is it.
Why not call it an Intrepid then? It's pretty obvious that DCX changed the name of the next Intrepid to Charger because the killed the one that everyone liked.
Z28Wilson 01-07-2005, 06:48 AM The Charger is missing a lot. A sexy shape, for starters.
92RS shearn 01-07-2005, 12:27 PM They should have called it the magnum sedan. Intrepid is a good 2nd choice. I really liked the 99 concept. Too bad it de-evolved to this.
Z284ever 01-07-2005, 12:36 PM I REALLY wanted to like the Charger. Maybe I'll feel differently when I see it in the flesh.....but right now, I can barely bear to even look at it.
BTW, it's not simply because they used the Charger name. Even if it were called Coronet, Intrepid or whatever....I'd still feel the same way.
JoeliusZ28 01-07-2005, 06:47 PM it needs some black... spolier, tailpanel, bumper section, anything.
|