Charger pics from Autoweek

SS Thriller
01-04-2005, 04:44 PM
http://www.autoweek.com/files/specials/2005_detroit/dodge/charger/images/

94Z28/03mach1
01-04-2005, 06:00 PM
cool info,if ya poke around you can find a dodge write-up of the charger.0-60 in 6 seconds is not bad.50/50 weight dist is not bad either.Gonna need that 6 liter hemi to do battle with the GTO and stang though.

uluz28
01-04-2005, 06:05 PM
Sweet Jesus, that thing is hideous :barf:

Steve0
01-04-2005, 06:13 PM
:(

I just cant like it. In my opinion the 300C is much more handsome.

Raven99
01-04-2005, 06:18 PM
That is disappointing beyond words :( Worse styling mishap than the GTO. That is NOT a Charger IMO.

Eric77TA
01-04-2005, 07:09 PM
I don't inherently dislike the car overall, but would have preferred this as a Coronet R/T rather than a Charger R/T. At least it is an R/T (at least on this car) I think all the Magnums I've seen just have RT, no?

JEDCamino
01-04-2005, 07:11 PM
Man, I don't like that at all. :(:irk:

PacerX
01-04-2005, 07:12 PM
OHMYGOD!

It's contracted the deadly DaimlerChrysler "Two-too many doors" syndrome that the SRT-4 suffers from!

SFireGT98
01-04-2005, 07:28 PM
Nice sedan, but not a Charger. :no:

indieaz
01-04-2005, 07:56 PM
What, no cupholders?

Z28Wilson
01-04-2005, 07:59 PM
One word comes to mind looking at those picks. Frumpy. It seriously has no sportiness to it whatsoever.

IMPALA64
01-04-2005, 10:05 PM
A couple inches lower, and some different wheels and I think it'll be cool. I bet this is one of those cars that looks much better viewed in person.

Magnum Force
01-04-2005, 11:41 PM
"Mr. Griswold.....you think you hate it now, but wait 'til you drive it!!"