stock bottom end, but hogged out heads?

Sneakin Deacon
10-25-2004, 04:17 PM
it occured to me a cheaper and easier route to go would be to leave the bottom end stock, but use a head with a 72cc combustion chamber...that would put me right around 9:1 CR...my question is, would the stock bottom end still be a problem as far as 500rwhp is concerned?

engineermike
10-25-2004, 07:44 PM
I went that route. With AFR 210's, stock bottom end, 210/224 cam, 9/1, 14 psi T-trim, and no aftercooler, I made 470 rwhp through a TH-350. I made that hp with race gas mixed in because of detonation problems. On pump gas, it only made 430 rwhp.

TimbrSS
10-25-2004, 11:34 PM
With Forced Induction, and most high performance upgrades, the most expensive route up front is usually the cheapest in the long run.

JWBerk94Z
10-26-2004, 07:11 AM
I thought about trying that, but it worries me to think I would sink that much money into a nice set of AFR's just to have a piston crap out on me and ruin one of them. Maybe I am off base, then again maybe I am just chicken, LOL. I am interested to see what type of response this thread gets, because I have had the same idea as you for a while.

racr4jc
10-26-2004, 09:11 PM
The way i understand it, the weakness lies not only in the CR, but in the stock LT1 pistons themselves as they are prone to failure when subjected to detonation.

Alvin@pcmforless.com
10-26-2004, 10:20 PM
I wish I would have kept a reasonablly flat piston (forged) that way if I got sick of FI I could go back to a NA setup without swaping short blocks.

I don't know if you could find a blower dedicated piston like that though. Usually they are thicker in the crown but also dished for lower compression.