which car is faster?

whats faster in the 1/4 mile?A 2002 camaro ss or a 2003 mach 1 mustang.

The ss, but anything can happen at the track.

last time I went to the track there was a stock mach 1 there running 14.0-14.3

It was 90* and 80* humidity.

The 02 SS would be faster. Especially on the street.

The LS1 will normally trap more but there almost identical in the 1/4 mile

Assuming it was an actual Mach I, it should be close, but once again, ya never know. They run pretty good from the factory. And I believe they're lighter than the fbody as well.

The SS has a slight advantage, on the order of 2-3 carlengths in the 1/4 mile everything else being equal.

m6 ls1 is faster.



until i see some conclusive proof im not sold on mach 1s hitting 12s STOCK.



if you have any please show me.:cool:

Originally posted by ULTIMTEORANGESS
m6 ls1 is faster.



until i see some conclusive proof im not sold on mach 1s hitting 12s STOCK.





Exactly. Fastest stock Mach 1 by Evan Smith was a 13.1x at 105ish. He ran a 12.89 at 108ish in a bone stock LS1. It took Paul Svinicki DRs to get a very high 12 out of an otherwise stock Mach 1.

Originally posted by Steve Y
Exactly. Fastest stock Mach 1 by Evan Smith was a 13.1x at 105ish. He ran a 12.89 at 108ish in a bone stock LS1. It took Paul Svinicki DRs to get a very high 12 out of an otherwise stock Mach 1.




careful steve.you might cause an uproar. :lol:

That's pretty dang impressive for either car.

I agree that the LS1 has the slight advantage, although 108 mph trap vs 105 trap is a little more than a slight advantage.

Dan

Originally posted by stereomandan
That's pretty dang impressive for either car.

I agree that the LS1 has the slight advantage, although 108 mph trap vs 105 trap is a little more than a slight advantage.

Dan

Yes from high speeds the power and aerodynamics of the Camaro really shine. The Mach's gearing helps it in the lower speeds.

Originally posted by ULTIMTEORANGESS
careful steve.you might cause an uproar. :lol:

Oh well, I can't help it if people can't handle the truth. :D

In the 1/4 they seem to be about even. LS1s and mach1s can both run low 13s. Its a drivers race. Why dont you ask this question on mach-1.org so you can get the other sides opinions. I bet every other post will be


mach1


mach1


mach1


;)

Originally posted by Garbage
In the 1/4 they seem to be about even. LS1s and mach1s can both run low 13s. Its a drivers race. Why dont you ask this question on mach-1.org so you can get the other sides opinions. I bet every other post will be


mach1


mach1


mach1


;)

Except the answers he got here are correct. ;)

Originally posted by 97bowtie
Except the answers he got here are correct. ;)

Yep. Just because a lot of owners think their Machs are faster doesn't change the truth. Ricers think they can take Stangs and Camaros. Does that make it the truth? Not hardly.

And not opinions :eek: