Highlander 03-02-2004, 01:04 AM Which way should I go to say max 700rwhp not a hp more?
I know Richard Kraus did 733 with a BAP and a 340M which is what I have.
BAP quoted from kennedydynotunning is around 260... Twin in tank will be more or less that + installation, which I prefer not to go through again :(
IDOXLR8 03-02-2004, 07:17 AM I made 705 rwhp hp with a twin intank setup. IMO the thing works like a charm. Also I am still running stock fuel lines.
Roadie 03-02-2004, 11:28 AM I don't care too much for the way a boost-a-pump works. The pump was meant to run at 12 volts -- i don't like the idea of zapping it with a binch of extra juice to make it pump more.
With that said, it has been proven to handle the power... How long have setups like this lasted?
My vote goes for the twin in-tank, but I'd rather do the extra work once to avoid spending more and doing it a second time (learned things like this the hard way in the past).
Highlander 03-02-2004, 11:30 AM I figured this pump with the racetronix harness was going to widstand 600rwhp which was my final goal.. well.. it did... and at 55psi I might add. Now I want a bit more power...
Sometimes is not enough...
Racetronix 03-03-2004, 05:52 PM Contact Thunder Racing as they sell the MSD BAP for $229.99.
P/N 17-2350
boosted-lt1 03-03-2004, 07:29 PM IDOXLR8 -
Would you say you still had some more room to move up in HP with that pump?
IDOXLR8 03-03-2004, 07:46 PM Originally posted by boosted-lt1
IDOXLR8 -
Would you say you still had some more room to move up in HP with that pump?
I think I can hopefully push another 100 rwhp out of the setup.
Racetronix 03-03-2004, 08:40 PM Set the BAP between 16-16.5V. Any higher and the pump will start to cavitate.
Highlander 03-03-2004, 08:45 PM That will support how much more flow of fuel? power?
Racetronix 03-03-2004, 08:48 PM 50-100RWHP depending on the FP and motor's BSFC.
Highlander 03-03-2004, 09:01 PM I do not think more than .60
actually that pump and your harness gave me good till 607 and no drop in fp.
Racetronix 03-03-2004, 09:06 PM Are you running stock lines?
Highlander 03-03-2004, 09:07 PM Yes sir.. RSkrause did so too and he had 733rwhp with a BAP and a bosch 255lph..
ACtually.. Thanks.. I've been very happy with the setup... very happy
Racetronix 03-03-2004, 09:16 PM For the bucks you can't beat it...
When you get the MSD BAP set the max voltage to the thick red wire going into the module to 17V. This will put you at about 16.5V in the tank as the small length of factory wire and connector lose apx. 0.5V.
Highlander 03-03-2004, 09:18 PM Perfect.. thanks.. I will do!!!!!! THANKS!!!!
Got any specials on 75# inj?
NC-LT1 03-07-2004, 01:10 AM Racetronix,
Just recieved your Walbro 340 kit with body ground upgrade and alternator wiring kit for a 96 vette...what will this setup alone handle on a big single turbo car before needing to go to the MSD BAP? thanks in advance!
Chris
NC-LT1 03-07-2004, 01:11 AM Racetronix,
Just recieved your Walbro 340 kit with body ground upgrade and alternator wiring kit for a 96 vette...what will this setup alone handle on a big single turbo car before needing to go to the MSD BAP? thanks in advance!
Chris
Racetronix 03-07-2004, 03:04 AM Apx. 550RWHP with safety margin. Beyond that a MSD BAP is recommended.
Highlander 03-07-2004, 12:51 PM I did 607 w racetronix harness... which means!!! it supports 600rwhp...@60psi+++
mehoffz24 03-08-2004, 06:55 PM what is the difference between the BAP and the harness. doesnt the BAP raise the voltage to the pump as well as the harness? thanks
Racetronix 03-08-2004, 08:50 PM Originally posted by mehoffz24
what is the difference between the BAP and the harness. doesnt the BAP raise the voltage to the pump as well as the harness? thanks
Yes the harness provides whatever voltage the alternator has to deliver. The BAP is a voltage amplifier which can boost the voltage beyond the battery/alternator's voltage.
Highlander 03-08-2004, 09:29 PM The harness with the BAP is better than the BAP alone ;)
more "flow" of current.
Racetronix 03-08-2004, 09:40 PM Originally posted by The Highlander
The harness with the BAP is better than the BAP alone ;)
more "flow" of current.
Putting a BAP on the factory wiring only compounds the problem with the factory wiring.
marshall93z 03-09-2004, 06:22 PM what is a single 340 good for with the BAP?
Racetronix 03-09-2004, 09:21 PM 650-700RWHP with factory lines.
Depends on motor's BSFC and operating pressure.
Highlander 03-09-2004, 09:22 PM Richard Krause did 733
Racetronix 03-09-2004, 09:35 PM Originally posted by The Highlander
Richard Krause did 733
We always quote with a safety margin. :D
Highlander 03-09-2004, 09:43 PM JEJE...
I am hoping for only 700s not more!
Blownbird355 03-10-2004, 01:53 AM Are there pics of the dual pumps setup anywhere???
Racetronix 03-10-2004, 02:32 AM Originally posted by Blownbird355
Are there pics of the dual pumps setup anywhere???
http://www.racetronix.com/images/Fuel_Pumps/Dcp_1317b.jpg
Highlander 03-10-2004, 10:07 AM PRICE?
Grover 03-10-2004, 06:57 PM Is there any way to convert your single pump (GS340 high pressure) and harness to a dual pump and harness?
96TurboTA 03-10-2004, 07:01 PM Where can we buy the dual intank setup?
Racetronix 03-10-2004, 07:02 PM Originally posted by Grover
Is there any way to convert your single pump (GS340 high pressure) and harness to a dual pump and harness?
No, the system is totally different.
Racetronix 03-10-2004, 07:06 PM Originally posted by 96TurboTA
Where can we buy the dual intank setup?
Are you making over 700RWHP?
Blownbird355 03-10-2004, 07:58 PM Thats dual 255's?? also price with wiring and what hp is it good for with stock lines???
Highlander 03-10-2004, 08:00 PM and how much will a dual intank and dual BAP hold?
Racetronix 03-10-2004, 08:24 PM At this point the factory lines become a major issue. The head pressure at the pump gets too close to safety bypass pressure.
We have DP's running in cars with -6 TFE lines making 1000RWHP w/o BAPs.
Highlander 03-10-2004, 08:25 PM I was just kidding with that comment...;)
|