edelbrock exhaust

Hey I was wondering if anyone has an edelbrock exhaust or has heard one on the v6's. They have a sound clip of it on the LT1 on edelbrock.com and it sounds pretty mean. Ya I know are cars aren't LT1's, but hey can it really sound that bad?!?

anyone????

what kinda car is it on?

3.8L generally sound ricier, but the 3.4L sounds more like a truck, I guess cuz it ha a cam grind for a truck.

------------------
-Eric
1994 Medium Quaser Blue Camaro 3.4L V6 w/ 5-speed
Stock blocked, boltons only.
15.696@86.22 with a 2.214 60'!
Best R/T .507 Best 60' 2.078
Father's Stock 2000 Navy Blue Camaro 3.8L V6 w/ 5-speed
15.875@88.25 With wheel spin in 1st
3.4L F-body where 15s are fast....
www.fbodyv6.com
www.firebirdv6.com
www.camaroz28.com
AIM: MustangEater82

So it might sound pretty good on the 3.4 then right?

------------------
Black 94' 3.4l Camaro A4

I have a 95 3.4, so your saying it should sound ok

I ahve no idea how it will sound but on average, most aftermarket exhasuts sound decent on 3.4L in my expeorience.

I've got that exhaust on my 3.4L.

I highly recommend it. I got the 3", you might want to get the 2.5" if you're more concerned about drivability than performance.

The 2.5" gives modest performance gains, and keeps the torque that's down low there. The 3" gives greater top-end performance, but you do lose some low-end torque. But my car really wakes up above 3000 RPM now.

http://web.camaross.com/bb/smile.gif

------------------
1994 Black Firebird 3.4L
Mods include:"Ghetto Master" K&N FIPK, Crane 8MM Plug Wires and Accel Coil Packs, ASP Underdrive Pulleys, SLP Take-off Shocks and Struts, Edelbrock Performer RPM Catback, Catco Hi-flo Cat, 1 pc. steel DS, built GM 4L60E transmission.

"My kind of music is Marilyn Manson and Orgy. The kind of music that makes mothers hold their childrens ears when I drive by."

<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by NeoPaladin:
I've got that exhaust on my 3.4L.

I highly recommend it. I got the 3", you might want to get the 2.5" if you're more concerned about drivability than performance.

The 2.5" gives modest performance gains, and keeps the torque that's down low there. The 3" gives greater top-end performance, but you do lose some low-end torque. But my car really wakes up above 3000 RPM now.

http://web.camaross.com/bb/smile.gif

</font>

Does it sound pretty mean all the time or does it(like most of them) get ricey in the higher rpm's? Thanks for the help.

<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by serpentbmf:
Does it sound pretty mean all the time or does it(like most of them) get ricey in the higher rpm's? Thanks for the help.</font>

Actually, I think it sounds BETTER in the higher RPM's than the lower RPM's. One thing to keep in mind though, is that this exhaust is LOUD. I'd say that it sounds good at idle, slightly above, and then above about 2500 RPM. In that low range, it doesn't sound so great.

At least, that's what I think.

http://web.camaross.com/bb/smile.gif


------------------
1994 Black Firebird 3.4L
Mods include:"Ghetto Master" K&N FIPK, Crane 8MM Plug Wires and Accel Coil Packs, ASP Underdrive Pulleys, SLP Take-off Shocks and Struts, Edelbrock Performer RPM Catback, Catco Hi-flo Cat, 1 pc. steel DS, built GM 4L60E transmission.

"My kind of music is Marilyn Manson and Orgy. The kind of music that makes mothers hold their childrens ears when I drive by."

Thanks Neopaladin, you've been a lot of help and I hope to order one soon!