poSSum
09-05-2003, 01:06 PM
We had one of our media guys out to an Autocross. A snippet from the article, "This course was not suited to the powerful Camaro or even the 911 Targa that were competing."
I challenged him via e-mail about his statement, "As the owner of the "powerful Camaro" I'm a little disappointed with your assessment of it. In my opinion, finishing 6th in that group, in my first full season of competition, demonstrates that even a Camaro can be competitive."
His response: "Sorry if the intent of my sentence was lost: I only meant to suggest that the Camaro likes the more open layouts. Even Corey had suggested he would have preferred last week's course not be so tight."
Corey is our Autocross director, the owner and co-driver of the Miata that finished 2nd and 3rd. If he wanted a more wide-open course, for his Miata, why would the Camaro and 911 get singled out?
Here's the links to the complete article.
http://www.perldev.org/media/part1.jpg
http://www.perldev.org/media/part2.jpg
Link to the Winnipeg Autocross discussion on the article.
http://www.wpg-autox.org/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.pl?board=news;action=display;num=1061553023
Link to the complete results for the event showing the Camaro beating 3 Mustangs, 4 BMW's including a Z8 with aftermarket suspension, the Porsche 911 and a whole whack of, by inference, more suitable lower power cars.
http://www.wpg-autox.org/events/08122003/results/results.shtml
BTW, the Triumph Spitfire referred to in the article is really Doug the second driver of the Miata. How it really fares is reflected in the August 26 results where the Corvette and Camaro finished 2nd and 3rd behind the S2000.
IMO this helps reinforce that the media bias against the Camaro is real, and something that will need real effort to be combated by the 5th Gen. Fortunately just like women, who need to be twice as good and men to be considered equal, it's a task I'm sure the 5th gen will not find all that difficult!! :D
I challenged him via e-mail about his statement, "As the owner of the "powerful Camaro" I'm a little disappointed with your assessment of it. In my opinion, finishing 6th in that group, in my first full season of competition, demonstrates that even a Camaro can be competitive."
His response: "Sorry if the intent of my sentence was lost: I only meant to suggest that the Camaro likes the more open layouts. Even Corey had suggested he would have preferred last week's course not be so tight."
Corey is our Autocross director, the owner and co-driver of the Miata that finished 2nd and 3rd. If he wanted a more wide-open course, for his Miata, why would the Camaro and 911 get singled out?
Here's the links to the complete article.
http://www.perldev.org/media/part1.jpg
http://www.perldev.org/media/part2.jpg
Link to the Winnipeg Autocross discussion on the article.
http://www.wpg-autox.org/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.pl?board=news;action=display;num=1061553023
Link to the complete results for the event showing the Camaro beating 3 Mustangs, 4 BMW's including a Z8 with aftermarket suspension, the Porsche 911 and a whole whack of, by inference, more suitable lower power cars.
http://www.wpg-autox.org/events/08122003/results/results.shtml
BTW, the Triumph Spitfire referred to in the article is really Doug the second driver of the Miata. How it really fares is reflected in the August 26 results where the Corvette and Camaro finished 2nd and 3rd behind the S2000.
IMO this helps reinforce that the media bias against the Camaro is real, and something that will need real effort to be combated by the 5th Gen. Fortunately just like women, who need to be twice as good and men to be considered equal, it's a task I'm sure the 5th gen will not find all that difficult!! :D