SFC desing prefrance?

I just saw Sphons new sub frame connectors and they are now the tube style instead of the rectangular design.

My question is, which one do you guys think is better?

Will the tube style ones hold up just as well as the other design?

Thanks, Ken

ttt

I think box would be stronger and easyer to weld in. Tubular would work just as well.

------------------
http://bitchincamaro.no-ip.com (http://bitchincamaro.no-ip.com) 91 RS Camaro 5-speed black w/t-tops 305 TPI
MODS: SLP cold air intake w/K&N, air foil,Accel 19 LB injectors, March aluminum under drive pullies, Alburn pro posi, Aluminum drive shaft, Random Technology 3'' cat-back, 8.5mm MSD wires, 160 thermo, jet fan swich, Custom chip with 91 vette computer, SSBC slotted rotors, optima battery in the rear, BMR adjustable lower control arms and panhard rod, Kenny Brown strut tower brace, TB bypass, no egr, no air

I got the Alston ones and am happy with them. Just another option

Another vote for the Alston's.http://www.alstonracing.com $189 a set#102411 82-92 f body bolt in..and then weld later on.

------------------
'82 Z28
355,4 speed,misc bolt ons..

I have 2 fbodys and I think the box ones are better. Go with the weld in they are much better. Also get a strut tower brace. What a difference. It will handle like it is on rails. 99% of sqeeks and rattles will be gone.

------------------
87 IROC L98 700R4 A few mods. Best et 12.96 at 110 mph
All motor No NOS or Supercharger.
96 WS6 FORMULA Best et 13.5 at 105 mph

I whent over to the aliston site but the picture is so damn small I can't make out what they look like!

They kind of look like they are tubed style.

If the boxed style is stronger why is sphon changing their design over to the tube style? I don't get it!

I would say that the tube types are stronger. Another thing is the metal used. Alstons are tube design. They fit in neatly.

With the square design they said to weld in every six inches.

Do you still do that with the tubes or do you just weld it in on the ends?