2010 - 2015 Camaro Technical Discussion All 5th Generation Camaro technical discussion that doesn't fit in other forums

LS3 vs L99

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-09-2010, 05:51 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
thor48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1
LS3 vs L99

Other than the HP difference and the stick or manual shifter, is there any difference in the reliability of one engine over the other? Is the LS3 better than the L99? Should a person buy one over the other? Thanks.
thor48 is offline  
Old 01-10-2010, 03:19 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
supernova1972's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Indianpolis, IN
Posts: 190
L99s biggest differance is the AFM that will shut off 4 cylinders during cruising. Im sure longevity will be the same between the two. Personally, Id just get whatever you prefer, because both stock or modified will be great performers.

BTW I have you sig tattooed on my arm.
supernova1972 is offline  
Old 01-10-2010, 05:24 PM
  #3  
Admin Emeritus
 
JasonD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1997
Location: Nashville, TN area
Posts: 11,157
Here's something that might stir some dialog...define "better".
JasonD is offline  
Old 04-10-2010, 03:42 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Highlander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Juan PR
Posts: 3,083
I would buy the ls3 over the l99.

If you plan on modding, the ls3 is a better platform and option. Still being a manual is a plus. But the "simpler" the engine, the easier it is to mod and since it's the same engine as the vette, everything will come already for the ls3. You might come up with quite a few different things if you want to retain the AFM on a cammed car.
Highlander is offline  
Old 06-04-2010, 07:30 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Rob94hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 344
Just catching up on this stuff and from what I've been reading the LS3 have favorable rectangular cylinder head intake ports. Just read this in April 2009 GM High-Tech Performance mag.
Rob94hawk is offline  
Old 06-28-2010, 07:05 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
MileMan402's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 12
They'll both perform nearly identical because no one can shift as fast as the auto and the VVT is great in the l99. To just do a cam in an l99 is tough but to do FI its no harder than a LS3. It really comes down to whether you want manual or auto

Sent from my Droid using Tapatalk
MileMan402 is offline  
Old 07-29-2010, 09:44 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
Bucksrgone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1
There are some differences you may want to think about. There is a cam phaser (for VVT) mounted on the end of the camshaft for the L99 which is operated by oil pressure. The hydraulic roller lifters are very different and are also deactivated mechanically. There have been issues with these lifters in the past but they are warranted by GM for 100,000 miles so at least they think this issue is solved. The L99 has a lower compression ratio (10.4 vs 10.7) due to the flycuts made in piston tops for valve clearance due to the variable valve timing. The L99 is limited to 6200 RPM max while the LS3 is limited to 6600 RPM due to complexity of the AFM control system. The transmission torque converter tuning is coupled with the AFM to make transitions as smooth as possible. All of the this additional mechanical hardware coupled with a more complex electronic control system does add to the chance of failure but this has not shown up in the year or two these two options have been on the road. Hope this helps.
Bucksrgone is offline  
Old 07-29-2010, 07:55 PM
  #8  
Admin Emeritus
 
JasonD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1997
Location: Nashville, TN area
Posts: 11,157
Some good info right there!
JasonD is offline  
Old 09-29-2010, 11:28 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
Vette Pro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: hot lana, Gawja
Posts: 123
Originally Posted by MileMan402
They'll both perform nearly identical because no one can shift as fast as the auto and the VVT is great in the l99. To just do a cam in an l99 is tough but to do FI its no harder than a LS3. It really comes down to whether you want manual or auto

Sent from my Droid using Tapatalk
You obviously have not driven both cars...the auto does not shift that quickly sir... it is pretty EZ to shift quicker than the auto trans does.
Vette Pro is offline  
Old 10-02-2010, 04:43 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
Silverado27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: I was born and raised and reside in Philadelphia, PA.
Posts: 180
This is a great thread because I had the same question...Because if I was racing (which I never have before) I know I would only win with an auto because I can shift gears well, but I have never shifted to race before. I also know there is some kind of technique and way of shifting that I would have to learn. Definitely have more interest in the manual, though.
Silverado27 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sswagon
Drivetrain
5
09-22-2021 12:00 AM
leftclixLS3
2010 - 2015 Camaro Technical Discussion
1
09-17-2015 03:12 PM
BIGCOWL-IMP
Parts For Sale
0
12-19-2014 06:59 AM
punkdrum01
2010 - 2015 Camaro Technical Discussion
6
03-27-2008 08:21 PM
1fastlt1
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
2
09-23-2004 09:00 PM



Quick Reply: LS3 vs L99



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:54 PM.