2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: The ULTIMATE Z28 vs. SS Poll
Z28
105
60.34%
SS
51
29.31%
Other (ZL1, RS, etc.)
18
10.34%
Voters: 174. You may not vote on this poll

The ULTIMATE Z28 vs. SS thread. Where all Z28 vs. SS posts go to die...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-15-2008, 09:00 AM
  #46  
Registered User
 
91Z28350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,011
The L78 was not overrated. I only have anecdotal evidence to go by (being that I wasn't born until 1970) but my understanding was that L78's were actually producing somewhere in theneighborhood of 425 bhp from the factory.
91Z28350 is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 09:38 AM
  #47  
Registered User
 
Eric77TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,958
The Z/28 was both Super Stock (straight line) and Trans Am (curves) champion in 1968. The Super Stock Z/28 was faster than Super Stock L78s.

I think on the street, stock for stock, is up for grabs, but in Super Stock trim there was more power to unlock in the Z/28 than the already more powerful 396. From everything I've ever heard, the L78 was probably around 390 horsepower stock (that was the NHRA adjustment for it) and the Z/28 closer to 350.
Eric77TA is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 09:49 AM
  #48  
Registered User
 
HOTCIVIC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 279
Originally Posted by 90rocz
The COPO ZL-1's were the fastest, NOT SS or Z28.
All Aluminum 427ci/425hp(probably underrated), very limited production.

Interesting Read:
http://www.68rscamaro.com/camfacts/67z_hist/

With the same or more HP as the 396/375hp BBC, and weighing over 250lbs less, I'd have to say the 302ci H.O. Z28 was faster.
I don't doubt the Z/28 was underrated, but there's no way they put out 400 HP stock. With headers and tuning - maybe. Most estimates I've seen put the Z/28 @ 290 - 325 HP factory stock with 240 - 270 HP at the wheels. With tuning and exhaust it's a whole different story.
HOTCIVIC is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 10:25 AM
  #49  
Registered User
 
HOTCIVIC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 279
Originally Posted by Eric77TA
The Z/28 was both Super Stock (straight line) and Trans Am (curves) champion in 1968. The Super Stock Z/28 was faster than Super Stock L78s.

I think on the street, stock for stock, is up for grabs, but in Super Stock trim there was more power to unlock in the Z/28 than the already more powerful 396. From everything I've ever heard, the L78 was probably around 390 horsepower stock (that was the NHRA adjustment for it) and the Z/28 closer to 350.
Wrong again.

I'll quote Bob Cosby on this one (One of our more knowledgeable members) from a different thread:

Originally Posted by Bob Cosby
I'm sorry, but HOTCIVIC is correct on this one. "Old Reliable" only outran comparable 396SS cars while bracket racing. Heads-up, against an equally-equipped SS396, the 302 Z28 was significantly slower. One only has to look at NHRA Stock or S/S factoring for evidence. Notice the designation on the window....."SS/F". Big Block Camaros ran in SS/B (or one class up or down), and were easily 6-7 tenths faster (that's a lot in drag racing).

Bob
HOTCIVIC is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 10:50 AM
  #50  
Registered User
 
jrp4uc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hebron, KY
Posts: 1,724
+1 for Z28

Despite recent efforts to reign in the SS line as true performance vehicles, the moniker is still commonplace among Chevys and a bit watered down. That combined with the Corvette's use of "Z" designations at the top of its line leads me to believe the Z28 (w/ or w/o "/") should be the top-of-the-line model. I wouldn't even be against an SS-topping Z24 Cobalt!

That said, there will be nothing "watered down" about the Camaro SS and I'd have no hesitations about owning one. I hope the V6/base model is a capable car as well. I also like the idea of offering an RS package for entire line.
jrp4uc is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 10:59 AM
  #51  
Registered User
 
skorpion317's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,209
Originally Posted by jrp4uc
I wouldn't even be against an SS-topping Z24 Cobalt!
With AWD, and almost 300 HP. That'd give the Evo and STi guys something to worry about.
skorpion317 is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 11:15 AM
  #52  
Registered User
 
Eric77TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,958
Originally Posted by HOTCIVIC
Wrong again.

I'll quote Bob Cosby on this one (One of our more knowledgeable members) from a different thread:



I had always heard that Old Reliable was pretty much just as fast. It currently runs 11.8s in about the same trim as it had in 1968. What were the Super Stock 396s running at the time?

And whether we're talking bracket or heads up, it was still a racing champ in 2 series in 1968, which I think counts for something.
Eric77TA is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 11:23 AM
  #53  
Registered User
 
09camaroZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: long island, ny
Posts: 130
i would love to see the Z28 as the high performance model but im not shure if it will be. it could go either way because the SS was the top model in the 4th gen and the Z28 was the top model in the other gen. i dnt know but my opinion is it could go either way.
09camaroZ28 is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 11:27 AM
  #54  
Registered User
 
HOTCIVIC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 279
Originally Posted by Eric77TA
I had always heard that Old Reliable was pretty much just as fast. It currently runs 11.8s in about the same trim as it had in 1968. What were the Super Stock 396s running at the time?
The SS/B cars ran at least 6 to 7 tenths faster. A few tenths may not sound like a lot, but it is a HUGE difference in the 1/4 mile.

Originally Posted by Eric77TA
And whether we're talking bracket or heads up, it was still a racing champ in 2 series in 1968, which I think counts for something.
If we're talking drag racing, it says more to me about the driver of the car. It's more about reaction time and running your dial-in rather than the actual speed of the vehicle itself. In bracket racing, a 14 second car can beat a 10 second car if it runs the number and has a better reaction time.

Old Reliable's E.T.s are still impressive though.
HOTCIVIC is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 12:17 PM
  #55  
Registered User
 
1fastdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: FL/MI
Posts: 1,808
Thanks for posting the link as it mentions one of the first Z/28 owners as David D. Horchler, who is a friend of mine. One of my favorite people when it comes to early TransAM racing lore, including some interesting behind the scenes stories about Roger Penske and his TransAM efforts. Dave, BTW, had the yellow ZL1 < that Roger Judski ended up with > as his company car for a time. Dave raced TransAM for a few years Gib Hufstader < a name most hi -performance Chevy fans should know > was among his co drivers.
Sorry to digress...back on topic... Z/28 started as a road racer car...keep it that way. Those that are fond of the SS will want the SS to be "Top Dog" and Z/28 folks will champion their favorite.
I'm far more into road racing than drag racing, but I have good friends involved in both. I have owned 5 Z/28's, and I think what you buy says much about what you think is "Top Dawg".

Originally Posted by 90rocz
The COPO ZL-1's were the fastest, NOT SS or Z28.
All Aluminum 427ci/425hp(probably underrated), very limited production.

Interesting Read:
http://www.68rscamaro.com/camfacts/67z_hist/





With the same or more HP as the 396/375hp BBC, and weighing over 250lbs less, I'd have to say the 302ci H.O. Z28 was faster.

I'd say they should follow a formula like this, not equalling the Vette exactly ofcourse, but:
Z/28 = Z/06
SS(Z/L1?) = Z/R1
1fastdog is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 01:43 PM
  #56  
Registered User
 
jg95z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oakland, California
Posts: 9,710
I've said something (more or less) to this effect in the past:

Camaro SS = the meat and potatoes, working man's bread and butter, high performance, street and strip, daily driver, V8 Camaro that can be optioned anywhere from no-frills to everything including the kitchen sink, available in coupe or convertible form.

Camaro Z/28 = the limited edition, limited availability, ultimate Camaro built to be taken straight from the showroom floor to the racetrack and dominate in its class. For this cause some exotic and lightweight materials may be used to improve performance over the SS. Limited options, only available as a coupe.
jg95z28 is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 02:23 PM
  #57  
Registered User
 
Ray86IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 642
On the subject of old muscle power, I was doing some searches for 302 Z28 numbers and found a couple interesting posts online. That is stone stock and I'm sure they're choked (as the bigblocks would have been too) but that is no 400 hp, even accounting for Gross numbers. If you figure that's a little under 300 net hp today at the engine, 325-350 gross hp was probably about right for back then

I have a friend that put his car on a dynojet chassis dyno. It is a 69z with a m21. At the time he had it on the dyno it was all stock as far as the long block but he did put on a performer rpm intake and a 750 dbl pumper ( He has since put it back to original ). The car made 245 rwhp and most dynojets a a little optimistic. So if you figure in drivetrain loss that puts you in the neighborhood of the factory rating. If you would like to see the car on the dyno I beleive theres a pic on the shops web site its called pauls high performance in jackson, Mi . I think the link is www.paulshp.com (http://www.paulshp.com) . Its the fathom green z in the pic gallery.
and

I put my 69 RS Z28 on the chassis dyno last summer and it made 240rwhp and 242lbft of torque. They went to only 7200 RPMs and it seemed to still be making power but I did not want to push it any further. The motor was bone stock right down to hose clamps.
Since then, I rebuilt it .030 over, pocket ported the heads, and put headers on it with an X pipe. I'll be going back on the dyno in a few weeks to see what improvements I've actually made. I can sum my Z up in three words- TIRE SMOKING ANIMAL!


I would really really love to see a accurate same day/same dyno comparison of most of the hot old muscle cars on a dynojet. The few I've seen (HPP mag did a GTO dynotest shootout awhile back against a LS1 GTO for comparison) were pretty weak for the oldschool stuff. I seem to recall a 330ish rwhp number for a stock 426 Hemi in a Hemi vs Viper shootout but I don't recall the exact numbers.

If anyone has any for any of the 396 muscle cars post em up, I haven't found any w/ stock setups.

Last edited by Ray86IROC; 04-15-2008 at 02:43 PM.
Ray86IROC is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 03:14 PM
  #58  
Registered User
 
notgetleft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: manassas, VA
Posts: 808
Originally Posted by skorpion317
The Z/28 should be the top model, as it was for the vast majority of the Camaro's lifespan. There shouldn't even be any debate.
Round and round this goes....

Yeah, and z28 was a low cost option that was put on a large percentage of the cars built most of that time too. Now suddenly z28 is going to be a limited production, ultra high price option after years of it being practically a 'base' V8 car?

A special edition camaro that shares a badge with what maybe > 1million sub 200hp camaros, the marketing department is going to sure have an easy go at polishing that badge up that high. I'm sure it will work for the rose colored glasses crew. The big question then is, how many of them are there? Of course, with the over the top retro interior too, i'm pretty sure the folks in charge are betting pretty high on the cache of 'camaro' and especially first gen nostalgia, so why not keep that theme with the 'fabled' badge too.
notgetleft is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 03:48 PM
  #59  
Registered User
 
supr_bikr_99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dublin, OH
Posts: 106
Originally Posted by skorpion317
The LS7 will be out of production after this year, IIRC. It also costs too much to put in the Camaro.

The LS9 is WAY too expensive to put in a Camaro, not to mention that GM won't want any other car besides the Corvette to have the LS9.

The Z/28 will be getting the supercharged LS8, with ~525 HP from what I've been hearing.
Yeah, I knew the LS7 will be gone soon and I agree with the cost of the LS9. I was just using what was currently available to describe how I'd like to see it laid out. My personal opinion and reality is different though. I'd love to see the Z/28 have the LS8 as an option, but I don't know if that would be cost efficient. I guess a better way to have said it in my original post would have been "LS_ or available equivalent".
supr_bikr_99 is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 03:54 PM
  #60  
Registered User
 
HOTCIVIC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 279
Originally Posted by Z284ever
By that time, the Z/28 brand had pretty much sucked the performance oxygen out of the Camaro's room. The SS was becoming the luxo-cruiser, and Chevy knew it. Chevy simply re-focused the Camaro SS's marketing position and called it the Type LT.
I highly doubt it.

Originally Posted by Z284ever
From my personal first hand encounters, it appeared that there was little or no understanding of Camaro's history at that particular time by those involved.
I don't think Scott would appreciate that.
HOTCIVIC is offline  


Quick Reply: The ULTIMATE Z28 vs. SS thread. Where all Z28 vs. SS posts go to die...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:28 PM.