2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Could this mean trouble for the new Camaro?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-17-2007, 08:32 AM
  #16  
Registered User
 
MarcR94v6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,960
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
The towing capacity on the new Tundra is 10,800 pounds.
"starting 10,000 lbs from a dead stop isn't easy..." .

How right you are toyota, a 5,000 lb truck towing 5,000 lbs would equal 10,000 lbs. You get a gold star in math, Toyota! As well as 10 gold stars in advertising.

People have been buying the truck on impulse and are quite confused and disappointed with it's weak towing ability and poor fuel economy. Everyone else likes that it looks nice on the inside and goes "kinda fast!"...

Last edited by MarcR94v6; 05-17-2007 at 08:37 AM.
MarcR94v6 is offline  
Old 05-17-2007, 08:53 AM
  #17  
Registered User
 
JB22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 211
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
The towing capacity on the new Tundra is 10,800 pounds.
Didnt they find out that included the weight of the truck?
JB22 is offline  
Old 05-17-2007, 08:57 AM
  #18  
Registered User
 
94Z28rag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 420
Wow...I never realized that included that weight. That's pretty sad that they have to resort to that type of advertising. I hate Toyota even more now.
94Z28rag is offline  
Old 05-17-2007, 09:07 AM
  #19  
Registered User
 
Silverado C-10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,897
Not sure why this made it's way onto the 09 Camaro forum, but whatever.

Yes, the tundra can tow *up to* 10,800lbs with certain regular cab configurations. The crew cab and crewmax are closer to 10,400-10,600 depending on equipment.

The COMMERCIALS are rummored to be a play on words, showing the Tundra muscleing (sp?) loads that are actually 5,000 pounds and including the weight of the truck to say things like "starting 10,000 lbs from a dead stop isn't easy," making the consumer believe that the load is 10,000lbs, when it's only half that to make the truck look better.

But in reality, it CAN tow over 10K.

As far as the supra... who gives a ****. Last weekend, driving from fl to sc, I saw about 30 corvettes. I saw zero supras, I think it's been a few years since I've seen a single one.

People who want to buy a foreign sports car will buy them reguardless.
Silverado C-10 is offline  
Old 05-17-2007, 09:18 AM
  #20  
BBOMG Organizer
 
Hylton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 520
Originally Posted by skorpion317
They advertise that the truck is moving 10,000 pounds. I remember reading somewhere that half of that weight is the truck itself.
Don't kid yourself. That new Tundra is a serious rig.
Hylton is offline  
Old 05-17-2007, 02:20 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
Primus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: St. Peters, MO
Posts: 395
The only way this could be a threat to the Camaro is if it got 100 MPG.
Primus is offline  
Old 05-17-2007, 02:31 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
3rdGenNut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 218
If im not mistaken, the imports were priced to compete with vettes.
Thats why you see more pony cars.
Now if hyundai makes their underpowered pony for 8k less, how do you think they will sell?
Before you answer, consider all the "boy ricers"(my word) out there who havent opened their eyes to what adults drive.

Last edited by 3rdGenNut; 05-17-2007 at 02:34 PM.
3rdGenNut is offline  
Old 05-17-2007, 04:07 PM
  #23  
Super Moderator
 
JakeRobb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Okemos, MI
Posts: 9,479
Originally Posted by skorpion317
They advertise that the truck is moving 10,000 pounds. I remember reading somewhere that half of that weight is the truck itself.
This has been proven false. That commercial showed what the truck can do with a 10,000lb trailer (with electric brakes). I apologize -- I don't have the link. I'm sure you can use Google as well as I can.

5.7L V8 Tundras can tow either 10,400 or 10,800 pounds depending on cab configuration. Oddly, the crew cab model is the one with the higher towing capacity; the extended cab has the lower.
JakeRobb is offline  
Old 05-17-2007, 04:16 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
hyperv6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 515
Honda has made a better Harley for years but it is still not a Harley.

Camaro, there is no substitute.
hyperv6 is offline  
Old 05-17-2007, 09:21 PM
  #25  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Dwarf Killer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 321
Okay guys, but let's be realistic. More and more "loyal" domestic buyers are moving to imports and Camry, the #1 selling car is proof. We've heard all the smug BS about how "Toyota will never beat GM" and look who's on top now.

Don't try and tell me people who have owned Camaros won't buy a V8 turbocharged 2+2 muscle car from Hyundai. I've seen the most loyal GM buyers switch to imports in the last few years in scary numbers, spurred on by bad experiences with LT1 F-bodies in particular.

My decision on what to buy in 2010 will have to do with who is selling what I want, not necessarily brand loyalty. I and many others have told GM that the car to build is a SMALL 2+2 V8 sports car. They ignore that at their peril. If GM has once again prioritized a large car over the Camaro there will be trouble because it is evident from the link that Hyundai didn't make the same mistake.
Dwarf Killer is offline  
Old 05-17-2007, 09:52 PM
  #26  
Registered User
 
breakmyfootoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Odessa/Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 1,066
Originally Posted by Dwarf Killer
Okay guys, but let's be realistic. More and more "loyal" domestic buyers are moving to imports and Camry, the #1 selling car is proof. We've heard all the smug BS about how "Toyota will never beat GM" and look who's on top now.

Don't try and tell me people who have owned Camaros won't buy a V8 turbocharged 2+2 muscle car from Hyundai. I've seen the most loyal GM buyers switch to imports in the last few years in scary numbers, spurred on by bad experiences with LT1 F-bodies in particular.

My decision on what to buy in 2010 will have to do with who is selling what I want, not necessarily brand loyalty. I and many others have told GM that the car to build is a SMALL 2+2 V8 sports car. They ignore that at their peril. If GM has once again prioritized a large car over the Camaro there will be trouble because it is evident from the link that Hyundai didn't make the same mistake.
Exactly, I have owned 5 Camaro's, and I've loved all of them. I was so excited that the Camaro was coming back, imagining an evolution of the last generation. I was completely disappointed to find out that GM decided to go retro and build what looks like a modernized 69 Camaro. I've never even owned an import, but I would own one of those Hyundai V8/RWD cars before I own one of the new Camaros. I don't want a new car that resembles something from 40 years ago.
breakmyfootoff is offline  
Old 05-17-2007, 11:05 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
MarcR94v6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,960
Then why have I been reading so many negative reviews about the Tundra and it's towing capacity? A few reviewers even said that the salesman lied to them about towing capacity.

And lol and the last 2 posts. You may think it looks like a 69, others see modern. We're not trying to tell you people who buy Camaros won't buy a Hyundai, we're telling you straight up, most won't even consider it.
MarcR94v6 is offline  
Old 05-18-2007, 12:31 AM
  #28  
Registered User
 
Jim the Nomad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: ********.com
Posts: 215
I don't think theres a danger of Camaro people buying a hyundai pony car...

It's important that the "sporty 2 door" people don't buy the hyundai, though.

Underestimating the enemy is a bad idea.
Jim the Nomad is offline  
Old 05-18-2007, 09:08 AM
  #29  
Registered User
 
Silverado C-10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,897
Let's not forget that Hyundai has a little wiggle room with CAFE and fuel mileage averages to dump a V-8 in a small car, and restrictions are only going to get tighter.

Plus GM already has two 2 seater sport coupes (even if they don't have a V-8) and the Corvette. Dodge is adding the Challenger to the coupe market and Chevrolet is adding the Camaro... Let's also not forget that this is a very small percentage of market share. Although it will probably be a cool car, the Hyundai will most likely be very low volume.
Silverado C-10 is offline  
Old 05-18-2007, 09:32 AM
  #30  
Registered User
 
Z28CamaroPower!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Fargo, ND
Posts: 161
Exclamation

"I've seen the most loyal GM buyers switch to imports in the last few years in scary numbers, spurred on by bad experiences with LT1 F-bodies in particular."

Riiiiiiiiight.

Jim the Nomad is right - since you're bread-and-butter is the high volume V6 model for the Camaro, it has to appeal to the average (non-enthusiast who doesn't care about "tradition") buyer. Some of these average buyers will pick the Camaro over the Hyundai, and vice versa.
I would say the average buyer today will choose one or the other based on:
1. Which look they prefer
2. Which car has more/better options for which they are looking
3. Which car gets better gas mileage

Hopefully, a fence-sitter trying to decide between these two won't choose the Hyundai because "it's a foreign car, it's better built/better gas mileage/better resale value"...
Z28CamaroPower! is offline  


Quick Reply: Could this mean trouble for the new Camaro?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:49 PM.