2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos

Not Done Yet: Lutz says 'perhaps' to twin-turbo Camaro

Old 11-16-2009, 08:07 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
95redLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 1,505
Not Done Yet: Lutz says 'perhaps' to twin-turbo Camaro



Apparently, if you put Bob Lutz in a room filled with journalists asking pointed questions about specific vehicles, you won't get the industry-standard "we don't comment on future product" line. Following Maximum Bob's recent revelations about the CTS-V Sport Wagon and Coupe, along with a hybrid Chevrolet Impala, Buick Regal GS and a Caprice SS, when InsideLine asked Lutz about a twin-turbo version of the Chevrolet Camaro he simply responded "perhaps."

In addition to confirming a production version of the limited edition Camaro Synergy shown at SEMA and murdered-out Camaro, Lutz hinted at the possibility of a production version of the boosted, 425-hp V6 Camaro GM created for Jay Leno for this month's SEMA show. While it's far from a confirmation – and we all know how these things go with Lutz – it could be an indication that Chevrolet may be looking to beat Ford to the punch by offering a turbo'd version of its pony car. The only question now is when we'll receive an email from GM's PR team issuing the prerequisite denials... or an announcement that Fritz Henderson will require Lutz to wear a ball-gag at all future media events.
http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/16/n...-turbo-camaro/
95redLT1 is offline  
Old 11-16-2009, 09:05 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Klypto's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 1,419
its prob a tease to get us to talk about it on the netz. good idea even though i doubt well see it. would love it though
Klypto is offline  
Old 11-16-2009, 09:58 PM
  #3  
Prominent Member
 
Doug Harden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,282
Z/26
Doug Harden is offline  
Old 11-16-2009, 10:01 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
skorpion317's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,209


It'd be cool if it happens. I hope they would bump up the LS3's output to keep it one step ahead.
skorpion317 is offline  
Old 11-17-2009, 12:05 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Rob V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 554
Or twin-turbo the LS3 as well...?
Rob V is offline  
Old 11-17-2009, 12:51 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
Mario92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: somewhere in the usa
Posts: 31
Maybe things to come? Z/28 Twin turboed?
Mario92 is offline  
Old 11-17-2009, 08:09 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
2010_5thgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: ohio
Posts: 4,482
ever since i saw that car and read about it, i think it would be a pretty cool z28. granted its not the v8 that the z28 is used to having but it sure would top some of the v8's it has had in the past. not to mention it would be an amazing handler. with the CAFE restrictions in place and new ones coming in place, it makes sense to do this. theres a reason this motor was in this car, and i think it is to do this. stir up talk and see what everyone thinks. it will be used somewhere in some vehicle. im sure. im all for it.
2010_5thgen is offline  
Old 11-17-2009, 08:20 AM
  #8  
Super Moderator
 
JakeRobb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Okemos, MI
Posts: 9,479
I love that hood!

Originally Posted by Doug Harden
Z/26
No.

JakeRobb is offline  
Old 11-17-2009, 09:02 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
super83Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: City of Champions, MA, USA
Posts: 1,214
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
I love that hood!



No.

Its funny how "SS" gets bashed in the future vehicle section for being slapped on not so worthy cars. No one ever mentions the butchery that GM already did to the Zxx moniker.
super83Z is offline  
Old 11-17-2009, 09:11 AM
  #10  
Super Moderator
 
JakeRobb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Okemos, MI
Posts: 9,479
Originally Posted by super83Z
Its funny how "SS" gets bashed in the future vehicle section for being slapped on not so worthy cars. No one ever mentions the butchery that GM already did to the Zxx moniker.
I think that the Z24 Cavalier was, for its entire lifespan, a Zxx-worthy upgrade. The early Z24s with the 3.1L V6 and the 5-speed manual were a blast to drive! The later Z24s ('98+) weren't as torquey, but they were better in pretty much every other way.

The automatic-only Z26 Beretta and Z34 Monte Carlo might be a different story -- I never had any direct exposure to either of those -- but I'd argue that most people don't even remember those. For that matter, most people don't even recognize "Z28".

That doesn't even address the fact that the Zxx moniker is used for lots of different stuff. Z51 = performance suspension option, but never a badge. Z66 = street suspension for trucks, seen as a badge on Silverados and Avalanches. Z71 = off-road suspension for trucks. What GM has been consistent about is that Zxx is an RPO code indicating an optional suspension package. Sometimes there are other components that come along with that package, and sometimes there aren't.

Last edited by JakeRobb; 11-17-2009 at 09:14 AM.
JakeRobb is offline  
Old 11-17-2009, 09:49 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
DeuceGI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 123
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
I think that the Z24 Cavalier was, for its entire lifespan, a Zxx-worthy upgrade. The early Z24s with the 3.1L V6 and the 5-speed manual were a blast to drive! The later Z24s ('98+) weren't as torquey, but they were better in pretty much every other way.
I'll concur with Jake. My '89 Z24 with Yokohamas & Konis would easily corner with (if not outcorner) my '97 Z28 with its stock setup. With 1LE stabilizer bars & 275/40-17 tires on the Camaro--not so much. Still the first gen Z24s definitely earned their "Z" status.
DeuceGI is offline  
Old 11-17-2009, 09:55 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
Mario92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: somewhere in the usa
Posts: 31
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
I love that hood!



No.

You mean this one?
Name:  IMGP0477.jpg
Views: 12
Size:  27.1 KB
Name:  IMGP0481.jpg
Views: 11
Size:  44.6 KB
Name:  IMGP0482.jpg
Views: 18
Size:  33.3 KB

Mario92 is offline  
Old 11-17-2009, 10:26 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
jg95z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oakland, California
Posts: 9,710
Its not a moniker its just a flippin RPO code for cripesake.
jg95z28 is offline  
Old 11-17-2009, 10:45 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
Z284ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chicagoland IL
Posts: 16,179
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
I think that the Z24 Cavalier was, for its entire lifespan, a Zxx-worthy upgrade. The early Z24s with the 3.1L V6 and the 5-speed manual were a blast to drive! The later Z24s ('98+) weren't as torquey, but they were better in pretty much every other way.
The early 2.8/3.1 Z24's were fun, great performing cars. They were easy to own and very popular. And like you said, their torquey V6 (with available manual trans) and upgraded chassis made them lots of fun to drive.

Chevy could do well with a reborn Z24 package.
Z284ever is offline  
Old 11-17-2009, 01:36 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
81Z28355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hemlock, Mich.
Posts: 329
I find it hard to get excited over a car that with the added weight of twin turbo chargers and related components will be no better off than a Camaro SS weight wise and lack the V-8 tourqe monster between the fenders.

Camaro is a great looking car, but if you want the best all around performing 4 seat pony car I think Ford has this one in the bag. The next two years Mustang is really going to kick it up a notch.
81Z28355 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Not Done Yet: Lutz says 'perhaps' to twin-turbo Camaro



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:20 AM.