2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Motor Trend: GT500 vs SS drag race

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-07-2009, 03:36 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
super83Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: City of Champions, MA, USA
Posts: 1,214
Motor Trend: GT500 vs SS drag race

GT500 : 12.8 @115.3

SS: 12.9 @ 110.7

Good race.

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...son/index.html
super83Z is offline  
Old 07-07-2009, 03:46 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Outrun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Camaro chick in WI
Posts: 269
Good race indeed! I can't, however, justify spending 12-14k more for the GT500 and win by only 1/10th of a second.
Outrun is offline  
Old 07-07-2009, 04:18 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Bob Cosby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 3,252
Note the trap speeds, and this....

The Ford's big problem is traction. The rock-hard Goodyear Eagle F1 tires grip about as well as a pair of bowling *****, and you have to feather the gas otherwise the GT500 will be left standing in a cloud of tire smoke as the Camaro simply digs in and grunts away.
That kind of lack of traction hurts both ET and (to a somewhat lesser extent) MPH.

Both are bloated pigs - the GT500 just simply overpowers its bloated pigdom more than the SS.
Bob Cosby is offline  
Old 07-07-2009, 04:41 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Camaro25thann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 140
Notice they got the SS to 60mph in 4.5 seconds! Very good run!
Camaro25thann is offline  
Old 07-07-2009, 05:13 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
z28 justin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Perrysburg, OH
Posts: 427
Wow, not bad for being down over 100hp! Impressive indeed.
z28 justin is offline  
Old 07-07-2009, 05:19 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
99SilverSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,463
Well regardless of the price and power that was actually a good race for two cars in stock trim. In the real world runs like that are very common. The GT500 didn't run up to potential and the SS ran slightly better than most tests have shown. That happens day in and day out on tracks across the country and it's why the 2010 Mustang GT can still compete with the SS and why the LS1 cars are still relevant.

Video was one of the best yet for a real breakdown and just being fun to watch.

From the video the GT500 has quite a bit of rear wheel jounce while during the burouts. The areticle even eluded to that.

SS wins the 0-60 street fight. Yet for all the great comments about the Brembo brakes the SS takes more distance to stop from 60 mph but less than the GT500 at 100-0.

Last edited by 99SilverSS; 07-07-2009 at 08:44 PM.
99SilverSS is offline  
Old 07-07-2009, 05:41 PM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
super83Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: City of Champions, MA, USA
Posts: 1,214
Originally Posted by Bob Cosby
Note the trap speeds, and this....



That kind of lack of traction hurts both ET and (to a somewhat lesser extent) MPH.

Both are bloated pigs - the GT500 just simply overpowers its bloated pigdom more than the SS.
Are those the same tires on the GT with the track pack?
super83Z is offline  
Old 07-07-2009, 06:38 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
85LT1Z28MEX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mexico
Posts: 133
I don`t know..

every SS that runs at the local track is over 14 sec. in hands of good drivers and we are at sea level..

the best time known is 12.9x with headers / catback /programming


are this test cars from dealers? or chevy send them to tests ?
85LT1Z28MEX is offline  
Old 07-07-2009, 07:01 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
SSbaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,123
Originally Posted by 85LT1Z28MEX
I don`t know..

every SS that runs at the local track is over 14 sec. in hands of good drivers and we are at sea level..

the best time known is 12.9x with headers / catback /programming


are this test cars from dealers? or chevy send them to tests ?
Yeah, I don't think the SS could go much better than that. That's a great time for a stock car.

The IRS doesn't seem to hinder Camaro's launch yet that's what the drag racers supposedly despise.

Interesting that both a similar in weight, yet Camaro out-braked the Mustang from 100-0 (but not from 60-0).

EDIT: One more thing I noticed from MT's stats... the Camaro's f-r weight dist was listed as (58/42% - identical to Mustang's)... that can't be right as I thought it was almost perfect 50/50%)?

Last edited by SSbaby; 07-07-2009 at 07:11 PM.
SSbaby is offline  
Old 07-07-2009, 08:31 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
Bob Cosby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 3,252
Originally Posted by super83Z
Are those the same tires on the GT with the track pack?
No clue. But with over 200 more HP than the GT, one would hope not.
Bob Cosby is offline  
Old 07-07-2009, 08:38 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
krj-1168's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 184
Yeah - while the GT500 may have won the fight. The SS is definitely the better buy.

For the 13K difference in Price - a SS owner could get a good Supercharger kit (installed)for the LS3, 21 inch Wheels(better traction), and good after market Springs & Shocks(handling) to allow the Camaro to slay the GT500 on the track or the road.
krj-1168 is offline  
Old 07-07-2009, 09:25 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
Xilant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 37
Originally Posted by krj-1168
Yeah - while the GT500 may have won the fight. The SS is definitely the better buy.

For the 13K difference in Price - a SS owner could get a good Supercharger kit (installed)for the LS3, 21 inch Wheels(better traction), and good after market Springs & Shocks(handling) to allow the Camaro to slay the GT500 on the track or the road.
A larger rim diameter has nothing to do with extra traction.

245/40ZR21 or 245/45ZR20 = same diameter

If you want more traction you need a wider tire.

edit: I realize I put the specs of the front tires but you get my point.
Xilant is offline  
Old 07-07-2009, 11:19 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
Ok4thGen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Enid, Oklahoma Cofba/TFCC
Posts: 225
Lets not really get into this battle.
Honestly why buy a new camaro for 50k when you could pick up a LS1 Camaro for 6 to 8k and dump 42k in it to make it a whole world of faster?

Why do people buy the Camaro? Because its the car they like and want.
Why do people buy the Mustang? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Should i keep going?
Ok4thGen is offline  
Old 07-08-2009, 05:47 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
Bob Cosby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 3,252
Originally Posted by Ok4thGen
Lets not really get into this battle.
Honestly why buy a new camaro for 50k when you could pick up a LS1 Camaro for 6 to 8k and dump 42k in it to make it a whole world of faster?
Golly, then why would anybody buy a new car at all?

Know what I mean, Vern?
Bob Cosby is offline  
Old 07-08-2009, 06:09 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
426HPSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Toronto,Canada
Posts: 214
guess I am biased since I own one but this shows the undeniable incredible value story in the new Camaro SS. This car has extraordinary, timeless looks and the performance and dollar value speak for itself. Rather pull up in an SS....
426HPSS is offline  


Quick Reply: Motor Trend: GT500 vs SS drag race



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:08 AM.