2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Lutz: No more RWD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-21-2007, 10:16 AM
  #241  
Registered User
 
FS3800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,028
Originally Posted by Dan Baldwin
Michael Crichton is NOT a climate scientist. He is a writer of fiction.
very true.. and his opinion is based on a point of view outside the scientific community....

while not being a scientist, he has done a LOT of research.. into a ton of areas.. he's taken opinions of lots of people and formed his own.. just because he's not a scientist doesnt make his argument invalid..

also true that simply because it's consensus science, doesnt make it not true.. but the point is: you can't take it as solid fact just because most scientist agree on it..

it's very true that scientific theories across history have been proven wrong because science advanced the the point where it could find evidence to the contrary

i find it somewhat humorous that throughout history many scientists of the time though their science was right because it was more advanced than that of the past... the same is true now... we don't know if man is causing global warming right now, because science isnt advanced enough to know the full story... but yet meny scientist are so sure that they are right that we are causing it.. we'll see 20 years down the road what people say then.. it could go either way, true.. but until i see some absolutely concrete proof that we are causing this trend, not some half-*** circumstancial evidence... then i'll be the optimist and believe that our universe has it's own way and our insignificant society doesnt have as much of an effect as we like to think
FS3800 is offline  
Old 04-21-2007, 11:08 AM
  #242  
Registered User
 
61695's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 139
More BS about the myth of global warming.
61695 is offline  
Old 04-21-2007, 12:07 PM
  #243  
Registered User
 
Dan Baldwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Providence, RI, USA
Posts: 356
BS from those who refuse to look at the issue objectively.

Since science, especially what is being called "consensus science", has been always proven throughout history to be so very WRONG, shouldn't we dismiss with it altogether?

The arguments I'm seeing here are beyond ridiculous.
Dan Baldwin is offline  
Old 04-21-2007, 12:20 PM
  #244  
Registered User
 
FS3800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,028
Originally Posted by Dan Baldwin
BS from those who refuse to look at the issue objectively.

Since science, especially what is being called "consensus science", has been always proven throughout history to be so very WRONG, shouldn't we dismiss with it altogether?

The arguments I'm seeing here are beyond ridiculous.

seems to me that you are the one refusing to look at it objectively.. you seem like one of those "science can do no wrong" types... i never said that "consensus science" has been always proven wrong.. stop puting words in my mouth..

but it has happened.. and the point is, we don't know if we are right or wrong at this time with current theories... so we shouldnt blindly accept what is said by "consensus science" simply because it's a consensus
FS3800 is offline  
Old 04-23-2007, 08:59 AM
  #245  
Registered User
 
christianjax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Jacksonville Florida
Posts: 881
Consensus science said we were heading into another Ice age only 20 years ago. Has science advanced THAT much in 20 years? We can't even acurately predict the weather on any given day, let alone all this crap the GW Alarmists are predicting.
christianjax is offline  
Old 04-23-2007, 09:21 AM
  #246  
Registered User
 
Silverado C-10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,897
Didn't we once belive the earth was flat and that the sun revolved around us?

Just sayin....

Whether global warming is real or not (I think it is to an extent) we can all do our part to protect our planet

Remember the 3 R's? Reduce, Reuse, Recycle. If anything, were saving more our of resources and creating new ones

We've come a long way since 1967 in terms of emissions and technology. The new camaro will have more power, way better fuel mileage, quicker, quieter, more comfortable, and pollute a heck of a lot less than a 67 camaro did. Ain't progress sweet?

Last edited by Silverado C-10; 04-23-2007 at 09:25 AM.
Silverado C-10 is offline  
Old 04-23-2007, 09:29 AM
  #247  
Banned
 
shock6906's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sandy VJJville
Posts: 3,584
Originally Posted by Silverado C-10
Remember the 3 R's? Reduce, Reuse, Recycle. If anything, were saving more our of resources and creating new ones
Recycle, Reduce, Reuse, and close the loop. *we can close the loop* I remember those commercials.
shock6906 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
guionM
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
69
11-30-2006 02:01 PM
guionM
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
110
02-25-2003 09:00 AM
Caps94ZODG
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
11
02-22-2003 07:44 AM
formula79
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
21
01-18-2003 02:38 PM
z28projects4ever
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
133
07-26-2002 01:54 AM



Quick Reply: Lutz: No more RWD



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:34 PM.