2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2008 Camaro Pricing, Your thoughts.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-12-2006, 02:48 PM
  #61  
Registered User
 
CLEAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Arlington, Texas
Posts: 2,576
Re: 2008 Camaro Pricing, Your thoughts.

Heeeeere we go!
CLEAN is offline  
Old 08-12-2006, 02:49 PM
  #62  
Registered User
 
Good Ph.D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Mack and Bewick
Posts: 1,600
Re: 2008 Camaro Pricing, Your thoughts.

Good Ph.D is offline  
Old 08-12-2006, 03:20 PM
  #63  
Registered User
 
Good Ph.D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Mack and Bewick
Posts: 1,600
Re: 2008 Camaro Pricing, Your thoughts.

Its kind of an LT1 vs. LS1 thing...

But much like that the answer should be pretty obvious.

Z/28 has usually been rarer and empirically more performance oriented, stickers from 1993-2002 dont change that.
Good Ph.D is offline  
Old 08-12-2006, 03:25 PM
  #64  
Registered User
 
CLEAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Arlington, Texas
Posts: 2,576
Re: 2008 Camaro Pricing, Your thoughts.

Originally Posted by Mighty
I'm confused. Hasn't Z/28 always been an entry level V8? For all the years that Z/28 and SS coexisted, the SS had the more performance oriented options. Bigger engines, and such. Until the 4th gen, anyway. But even then, they still had more performance options.
Ok, heres the brief history of Camaro....

Back in ancient times, in the late 60's, you could get a Camaro w/ a V6 or V8, just plain Camaro, no RS, SS, Zthis, LT that, or anything. Chevrolet offered some packages though. RS was an appearance package mainly, had some chrome bits, hideaway headlights, relocated blinkers, gas cap, and other changes. The SS was a performance package that had the 350ci (thats cubic inches for you younguns ), HD suspension, stripe, different hood, SS emblems (starting to sound familiar?), grille, steering wheel, and a few other bits and pieces. If you wanted, you could combine the 2 to make an RS/SS, which got the RS appearance stuff, w/ the SS hardware. A very popular car for todays collectors. A few months into it, you could get an SS w/ a 396ci as well.

Now then, separate from all that, you could get a Z/28. The Z/28 was a handling package, and engine package. Its engine was limited to 5.0 liters, so that it could pass the SCCA's homologation requirements. It was RATED at 290hp, noteworthy as the begining of GM's underrating of Z/28 hp . It also came w/ a special suspension, wheels, tires, rally stripes, steering ratio, radiator, power front discs, and the close ratio 4 speed. Automatics and air were not available.

The Z/28 would drill an SS-350, and could hang neck and neck w/ an SS-396 in the quarter. It would outhandle all SS's. But it was built more as a street legal racecar (Z06 anyone?) than as an everyday car (SS). So not many were bought.

Over the next several years, The SS was phased out due to slow sales, as was the 396. The Z28 lost the 302, gained the LT-1, then lost it too. The Z28 became more of the generic "performance" Camaro. By the begining of the 4th gen, the Z28 was, in fact, the only way to get a V8 in a Camaro! The god's of the 60's were rolling in thier graves . The SS rolled back into the scene after being gone for 20 something years, as an enhanced Z28 as it were, not the separate model that it was before.

So there you have it, the Z28 was not always the base V8, it was only because Chevrolet diluted the line so much that it became so. The Z/28 was a distinct, focused, and hard edged car as it was originally conceived. Designed to win in SCCA. Back then, there was no "which one is better" argument because the cars were built for 2 different purposes. What makes a top dog? Engine size? HP? Performance? Handling? Price?

As for the SS over a Z thing...keep in mind that the C5 Z06 was internally known as SS for some time. The current SS being looked at has already been re-named Stingray. So there is precedent for either the SS or the Z, as being the top car. Just remember this, as spoken by one of our greatest heroes, "any Chevrolet can be an SS, only Camaro can be a Z/28".

As for price....just follow the Mustang, give or take a thousand or 2. Top dog Mustang pushes or exceeds 40k, Camaro probably will too. Average age of V8 Camaro buyers, 30+. 18-25 year olds...in their dreams (most of them, not all).

Last edited by CLEAN; 08-12-2006 at 03:39 PM.
CLEAN is offline  
Old 08-12-2006, 03:25 PM
  #65  
Registered User
 
Mighty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fort Gratiot, MI
Posts: 73
Re: 2008 Camaro Pricing, Your thoughts.

Originally Posted by Good Ph.D
Its kind of an LT1 vs. LS1 thing...

But much like that the answer should be pretty obvious.

Z/28 has usually been rarer and empirically more performance oriented, stickers from 1993-2002 dont change that.
So, by more performance oriented, you aren't talking about bigger engines?

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't 1967 - 1969 Z/28s all 302 cars, while their SS counterparts had the 350 and 396?

The 1970 - 1973 Z/28s had the 350, while their SS counterparts had the 350 and 396?

Am I wrong?

EDIT:
Originally Posted by CLEAN
Ok, heres the brief history of Camaro....

Back in ancient times, in the late 60's, you could get a Camaro w/ a V6 or V8, just plain Camaro, no RS, SS, Zthis, LT that, or anything. Chevrolet offered some packages though. RS was an appearance package mainly, had some chrome bits, hideaway headlights, relocated blinkers, gas cap, and other changes. The SS was a performance package that had the 350ci (thats cubic inches for you younguns ), HD suspension, stripe, different hood, SS emblems (starting to sound familiar?), grille, steering wheel, and a few other bits and pieces. If you wanted, you could combine the 2 to make an RS/SS, which got the RS appearance stuff, w/ the SS hardware. A very popular car for todays collectors. A few months into it, you could get an SS w/ a 396ci as well.

Now then, separate from all that, you could get a Z/28. The Z/28 was a handling package, and engine package. Its engine was limited to 5.0 liters, so that it could pass the SCCA's homologation requirements. It was RATED at 290hp, noteworthy as the begining of GM's underrating of Z/28 hp . It also came w/ a special suspension, wheels, tires, rally stripes, steering ratio, radiator, power front discs, and the close ration 4 speed. Automatics and air were not available.

The 302 would drill an SS-350, and could hang neck and neck w/ an SS-396 in the quarter. It would outhandle all SS's. But it was built more as a street legal racecar (Z06 anyone?) than as an everyday car (SS). So not many were bought.

Over the next several years, The SS was phased out due to slow sales, as was the 396. The Z28 lost the 302, gained the LT-1, then lost it too. The Z28 became more of the generic "performance" Camaro. By the begining of the 4th gen, the Z28 was, in fact, the only way to get a V8 in a Camaro! The god's of the 60's were rolling in thier graves . The SS rolled back into the scene after being gone for 20 something years, as an enhanced Z28 as it were, not the separate model that it was before.

So there you have it, the Z28 was not always the base V8, it was only because Chevrolet diluted the line so much that it became so. The Z/28 was a distinct, focused, and hard edged car as it was originally conceived. Designed to win in SCCA. Back then, there was no "which one is better" argument because the cars were built for 2 different purposes. What makes a top dog? Engine size? HP? Performance? Handling? Price?

As for the SS over a Z thing...keep in mind that the C5 Z06 was internally known as SS for some time. The current SS being looked at has already been re-named Stingray. So there is precedent for either the SS or the Z, as being the top car. Just remember this, as spoken by one of our greatest heroes, "any Chevrolet can be an SS, only Camaro can be a Z/28".

As for price....just follow the Mustang, give or take a thousand or 2. Top dog Mustang pushes or exceeds 40k, Camaro probably will too. Average age of V8 Camaro buyers, 30+. 18-25 year olds...in their dreams (most of them, not all).
Okay, great post. I was thinking in terms of larger displacement only.

Last edited by Mighty; 08-12-2006 at 03:28 PM.
Mighty is offline  
Old 08-12-2006, 03:28 PM
  #66  
Registered User
 
White2kSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 60
Re: 2008 Camaro Pricing, Your thoughts.

This is all from Wikipedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camaro#1969

1967-1969 Z28: 4.9 L (302 in³) Small-Block V8 290 hp (216 kW) @ 5800 rpm, 290 ft·lbff (393 N·m) @ 4200 rpm

1967-1969 SS396: 6.5 L (396 in³) Big-Block V8 375 hp (280 kW) @ 5600 rpm, 415 ft·lbff (563 N·m) @ 3600 rpm
White2kSS is offline  
Old 08-12-2006, 03:31 PM
  #67  
Registered User
 
CLEAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Arlington, Texas
Posts: 2,576
Re: 2008 Camaro Pricing, Your thoughts.

Originally Posted by Mighty
There, I fixed it for you.

Originally Posted by Mighty
You guys really are a bunch of elitists, aren't you?
No, but the SS vs Z28 debate was voted the #1 topic of all time, and has gone on for many years.

Last edited by CLEAN; 08-12-2006 at 03:36 PM.
CLEAN is offline  
Old 08-12-2006, 03:39 PM
  #68  
Registered User
 
Mighty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fort Gratiot, MI
Posts: 73
Re: 2008 Camaro Pricing, Your thoughts.

Originally Posted by CLEAN
There, I fixed it for you.


No, but the SS vs Z28 debate was voted the #1 topic of all time, and has gone on for many years.
That's funny. Well, thanks to you taking the time to explain it, you have one fewer horse beater on your hands.

Thanks again.
Mighty is offline  
Old 08-12-2006, 03:44 PM
  #69  
Registered User
 
CLEAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Arlington, Texas
Posts: 2,576
Re: 2008 Camaro Pricing, Your thoughts.

Originally Posted by White2kSS
This is all from Wikipedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camaro#1969

1967-1969 Z28: 4.9 L (302 in³) Small-Block V8 290 hp (216 kW) @ 5800 rpm, 290 ft·lbff (393 N·m) @ 4200 rpm

1967-1969 SS396: 6.5 L (396 in³) Big-Block V8 375 hp (280 kW) @ 5600 rpm, 415 ft·lbff (563 N·m) @ 3600 rpm
Do they have the 302's actual output in there, or just what GM rated it at?
CLEAN is offline  
Old 08-12-2006, 03:47 PM
  #70  
Registered User
 
CLEAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Arlington, Texas
Posts: 2,576
Re: 2008 Camaro Pricing, Your thoughts.

Originally Posted by Mighty
That's funny. Well, thanks to you taking the time to explain it, you have one fewer horse beater on your hands.

Thanks again.
CLEAN is offline  
Old 08-12-2006, 04:47 PM
  #71  
Registered User
 
slp97camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Elgin
Posts: 198
Re: 2008 Camaro Pricing, Your thoughts.

like i said before...i really dont care what the top model is...or if theres even an ss.....i just cant wait to get my hands on the new camaro...im sure we can all agree on that!
slp97camaro is offline  
Old 08-12-2006, 05:15 PM
  #72  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
FutureZMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sterling heights, Michigan.
Posts: 1,080
Re: 2008 Camaro Pricing, Your thoughts.

Originally Posted by 5thgen69camaro
Im confused, you want the nice cheap sports car but in the same thread you complain about the Dollar store interior as you call it. You do understand if it had a nicer interior that it wouldnt be free. IE the car would cost a little more.


wait till tomorrow, see what the news says then (thursday)

When you assume, you make an *** out of you and me.

I said the interior was cheap, but where did i say it bothered me? hmm... yep, exactly.

Back to the drawing board skipper.

Last edited by FutureZMan; 08-12-2006 at 05:22 PM.
FutureZMan is offline  
Old 08-12-2006, 05:18 PM
  #73  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
FutureZMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sterling heights, Michigan.
Posts: 1,080
Re: 2008 Camaro Pricing, Your thoughts.

Originally Posted by slp97camaro
you must have that mixed around...why would GM put the SS lower then the Z/28??? the SS has always been the more dominant special edition...maybe thats just my thought tho....?



Apparently your new to the camaro scene, so ill let you have this one for free.

The Z/28 was initally a sleeper street machine, completely capable of stomping the SS on the track and in the turns.

Your just confused due to the fact of what the camaro was from 1996 - 2002.

I forgive ya
FutureZMan is offline  
Old 08-12-2006, 05:21 PM
  #74  
Registered User
 
Mighty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fort Gratiot, MI
Posts: 73
Re: 2008 Camaro Pricing, Your thoughts.

Originally Posted by FutureZMan
***
Don't be scared. You can say ***.
Mighty is offline  
Old 08-12-2006, 05:22 PM
  #75  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
FutureZMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sterling heights, Michigan.
Posts: 1,080
Re: 2008 Camaro Pricing, Your thoughts.

Originally Posted by Mighty
Don't be scared. You can say ***.

OMGZ.
FutureZMan is offline  


Quick Reply: 2008 Camaro Pricing, Your thoughts.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:37 AM.