1967 Camaro SS 350 Vs 2010 Camaro V6
#16
The '69 SS350 came with a 300HP version (different than the 295HP versions in '67/'68), I have never seen, heard, or found any listing for a '69 350cid/350HP in a Camaro. The only other factory option 350cid enginges for '69 Camaro was a 250HP and a 255HP version. The 396cid was available in 325, 350, and 375 HP versions. 427cid versions were 425HP and 430HP.
Clyde
Clyde
I'll believe you Clyde because like I said....things got foggy in 1970....but it smelled nice with the incense.
#17
#18
I like the 1967 despite being "worse" as motor trend puts it, than the new V6 Camaro.
HP and all that stuff are just numbers. just look at it, the 1967 back in the day, was heart stopping good looking. GM didn't even stop there, every year they improved on it till the jaw dropping 69 one.
Man to be in that era of automotive history must of been like heaven.
HP and all that stuff are just numbers. just look at it, the 1967 back in the day, was heart stopping good looking. GM didn't even stop there, every year they improved on it till the jaw dropping 69 one.
Man to be in that era of automotive history must of been like heaven.
#19
To my knowledge, Chevy never offered a 427 in a Camaro except for the ZL1 cars and the COPO cars.
Also, the original "Z" was a high HP, low torque motor. The bore/stroke was very under square. It could rev like crazy but had no torque down low. It was in NO WAY a drag racer. It was intended solely for road racing where you could keep the revs high.
Also, the original "Z" was a high HP, low torque motor. The bore/stroke was very under square. It could rev like crazy but had no torque down low. It was in NO WAY a drag racer. It was intended solely for road racing where you could keep the revs high.
#20
I like the 1967 despite being "worse" as motor trend puts it, than the new V6 Camaro.
HP and all that stuff are just numbers. just look at it, the 1967 back in the day, was heart stopping good looking. GM didn't even stop there, every year they improved on it till the jaw dropping 69 one.
Man to be in that era of automotive history must of been like heaven.
HP and all that stuff are just numbers. just look at it, the 1967 back in the day, was heart stopping good looking. GM didn't even stop there, every year they improved on it till the jaw dropping 69 one.
Man to be in that era of automotive history must of been like heaven.
I think that is a generational thing, I felt the same way when the 97 Camaro came out, that it couldnt get any better, then the 98's rolled out and stole my heart Cars like the Corvette, and GTO also did that for me.
I think it's part of being young and liking cars and where they fit into your life. Hopefully that can continue for future generations. I'm 25 now, but when I (supervise) my 17 yo brother Driving my GTO, I see it in him too, the excitement.
#21
To my knowledge, Chevy never offered a 427 in a Camaro except for the ZL1 cars and the COPO cars.
Also, the original "Z" was a high HP, low torque motor. The bore/stroke was very under square. It could rev like crazy but had no torque down low. It was in NO WAY a drag racer. It was intended solely for road racing where you could keep the revs high.
Also, the original "Z" was a high HP, low torque motor. The bore/stroke was very under square. It could rev like crazy but had no torque down low. It was in NO WAY a drag racer. It was intended solely for road racing where you could keep the revs high.
#22
I think it would be fair to say that a 5th gen V6 will take a 1st gen 350/300 0-60 and in the quarter, although the trap speeds might be close.
keep in mind that if you compare one to a 1st gen Z/28 with a M22, I think they had a 2.20 1st gear. The 5th gen will have a 4.XX gear in the auto, so the torque multiplication is about 70-80% more even with the taller rear gear and tires the 5th gen has.
keep in mind that if you compare one to a 1st gen Z/28 with a M22, I think they had a 2.20 1st gear. The 5th gen will have a 4.XX gear in the auto, so the torque multiplication is about 70-80% more even with the taller rear gear and tires the 5th gen has.
#23
To my knowledge, Chevy never offered a 427 in a Camaro except for the ZL1 cars and the COPO cars.
Also, the original "Z" was a high HP, low torque motor. The bore/stroke was very under square. It could rev like crazy but had no torque down low. It was in NO WAY a drag racer. It was intended solely for road racing where you could keep the revs high.
Also, the original "Z" was a high HP, low torque motor. The bore/stroke was very under square. It could rev like crazy but had no torque down low. It was in NO WAY a drag racer. It was intended solely for road racing where you could keep the revs high.
Clyde
#25
Add all of the factory performance options to the order list, the right gears, and someone that knows how to drive one.....your opinion would be very different. The 1st Gen Z28 holds more drag racing records than big block SS Camaros IIRC. (and of course SCCA road racing ones also)
#27
Clyde
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
12-30-2014 09:40 AM
ChrisFrez
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
1
12-15-2014 03:09 PM
ChrisFrez
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
2
12-07-2014 06:01 PM