2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia All 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 Camaro news, photos, and videos
View Poll Results: Is $50,000 a good VALUE if the Z28 is what we are expecting it to be?
Yes
50.00%
No
39.29%
I don't know
10.71%
Voters: 56. You may not vote on this poll

$50 grand* for a Camaro Z28. Is that a good VALUE**?

Old 10-06-2010, 07:57 AM
  #61  
Registered User
 
WhiteHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 943
Originally Posted by 2010_5thgen
what was so far off? the fact that i had a new 99 v6 that was 22k or the fact that the sticker on the SS was 32k that i almost bought? tell ya what, if i can find my window sticker from my car, ill take a picture for you, just to rub it in your face.....
You are far off because the cheapest V8 you could get in 2002 was $22,830 and the cheapest V8 now is $31,795 with freight. That has been my only point this whole thread. You are pricing out special editions and optioned cars and trying to compare them. I am talking apples to apples base cars from GM not SLP.

-Geoff
WhiteHawk is offline  
Old 10-06-2010, 08:02 AM
  #62  
Registered User
 
WhiteHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 943
Originally Posted by STOCK1SC
If you compare the amount of material that goes into the 5th gen compared to the 4th it is a greater value, added side airbags, standard brembos, onstar, XM, IRS, 6 speed auto, the content is way above what you were getting for your money in the 4th gen. 4th gen was basically an engine wrapped in a shell barely capable of holding up to twisting in half compared to the 5th gen. I'm no lover of the 5th gen but it is more car for the money, it just isn't a faster car than it was 10 years ago unfortunately.
I totally agree with everything you are saying. But it would be nice if they did an LS V8 in the mid to high 20's for a fun daily driver like the old 2002 Z28 used to be. That is all I am saying.

-Geoff
WhiteHawk is offline  
Old 10-06-2010, 08:04 AM
  #63  
Registered User
 
2010_5thgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: ohio
Posts: 4,482
Originally Posted by WhiteHawk
You are far off because the cheapest V8 you could get in 2002 was $22,830 and the cheapest V8 now is $31,795 with freight. That has been my only point this whole thread. You are pricing out special editions and optioned cars and trying to compare them. I am talking apples to apples base cars from GM not SLP.

-Geoff
ok...i wasnt comparing the cheapest v8's....and im not quite sure why you were. we apparently are on 2 different roads here. no wonder everything your saying isnt making sense to me.
2010_5thgen is offline  
Old 10-06-2010, 01:56 PM
  #64  
Registered User
 
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: TX Med Ctr
Posts: 4,000
What content did the cheapest V8 have in 2002? Did it even have power windows or locks?
HAZ-Matt is offline  
Old 10-06-2010, 02:19 PM
  #65  
Registered User
 
STOCK1SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Confederate States of America
Posts: 1,049
Originally Posted by HAZ-Matt
What content did the cheapest V8 have in 2002? Did it even have power windows or locks?
I ordered a stripper 1SC 2002 Z28 and it didn't have power windows or locks, no cruise, no rear defroster. The options I added were tan leather manual seats, steering wheel with radio controls, and a hurst shifter. You would literally break a rib on the center console trying to roll up the passenger window while driving. Paid $19k for it with the Camaro Legends Tour coupon for $1k off, college grad $500 off, and 1 other incentive Chevy had at the time I can't remember. Ordered it in Dec 2001 and got it on Valentines day 2002. I wanted to get an SS at the time but for 2002 Chevy wouldn't let you order a stripper SS anymore, you could in 2001 but not 02 so they lost a bit of money on that sale. Car weighed in at 3440lb's so it was about 400lb's lighter than the new ones.
STOCK1SC is offline  
Old 10-07-2010, 06:56 AM
  #66  
Registered User
 
2010_5thgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: ohio
Posts: 4,482
as far as quality goes, the 5th gen is much better interior quality than the 4th gen. my 99 camaro and trans am just felt really cheap. seats were nice with the lumbar but not as comfortable as the 5th gen.
2010_5thgen is offline  
Old 10-07-2010, 08:43 PM
  #67  
Registered User
 
Chuck!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 2,612
Originally Posted by Outrun
Yes!
Yep and I wish I had the disposable income to afford it. It is going to be one fun car to drive. Hopefully one day I will be able to drive it.
Chuck! is offline  
Old 10-10-2010, 07:11 PM
  #68  
Admin Emeritus
Thread Starter
 
JasonD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1997
Location: Nashville, TN area
Posts: 11,157
Chris and I discussed this in CamaroZ28.Com Podcast #266. Download and listen for free!
JasonD is offline  
Old 10-10-2010, 09:05 PM
  #69  
Registered User
 
King Moose SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 1,071
CTS-V starts at $65k. And its great value for a car.

Camaro Z28 with the same engine for $50k, sounds like a bargain to me.
King Moose SS is offline  
Old 10-10-2010, 09:07 PM
  #70  
Registered User
 
Bayer-Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: N Falmouth MA
Posts: 2,597
God cars have gotten so expensive in this lifetime. With the total in parts and what you get, then yeah. Full leather, proposed LSA, tweaked trans, different wheels, brakes and maybe a couple other unknown performance options, then yeah, definetly getting a lot considering a C6 GS is in the $50k range as it is but with a slightly less powerful engine.

It would also have a bit of exclusivity to it. And on another note, if it's priced in the $50k range, that would prevent the "kids" from getting their hands on it and ending up killing themselves or other people with it when they WILL indeed try racing someone on the street with it. The older (~35+) crowd would be able to afford it in that range but will also be more responsible with the ca compared to the younger crowd.

ZR1 is to the Vetts as the Z28 would be to the Camaro. If it was specially built and possibly hand built, then it would be in the ZR1/ZO6 territory.

Last edited by Bayer-Z28; 10-10-2010 at 09:14 PM.
Bayer-Z28 is offline  
Old 10-11-2010, 08:30 AM
  #71  
Registered User
 
2010_5thgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: ohio
Posts: 4,482
Originally Posted by Bayer-Z28
God cars have gotten so expensive in this lifetime. With the total in parts and what you get, then yeah. Full leather, proposed LSA, tweaked trans, different wheels, brakes and maybe a couple other unknown performance options, then yeah, definetly getting a lot considering a C6 GS is in the $50k range as it is but with a slightly less powerful engine.

It would also have a bit of exclusivity to it. And on another note, if it's priced in the $50k range, that would prevent the "kids" from getting their hands on it and ending up killing themselves or other people with it when they WILL indeed try racing someone on the street with it. The older (~35+) crowd would be able to afford it in that range but will also be more responsible with the ca compared to the younger crowd.

ZR1 is to the Vetts as the Z28 would be to the Camaro. If it was specially built and possibly hand built, then it would be in the ZR1/ZO6 territory.
im no kid and i sure as hell arent in the 35+ crowd and i definately would buy one.
2010_5thgen is offline  
Old 10-11-2010, 03:55 PM
  #72  
Registered User
 
rod442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Ypsilanti, MI
Posts: 385
If I missed a few things posted earlier, sorry. I only scanned the thread.

IMO. To say the proposed Z28 is a GOOD value it would have to come with either similar options and performance and slightly less price, than the competition. OR be better in one of those 2 catagories. Ideally both, for the same money.

Off the top of my head, this means comparing to a 2011 shelby which stickers at what, 50k also? Otherwise the Z28 is just the same car as you can buy from the competition. No added "value". So it has to perform noticeably better (not talking .2 of a second in accelleration runs); OR have something the competition doesn't. Maybe IRS is it.

Granted, Im taking brand loyalty out of the equation.
rod442 is offline  
Old 10-11-2010, 04:01 PM
  #73  
Member
 
CamaroScotty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: CEDARBURG, WI
Posts: 583
Wonder if GM will put a NO MARK UP clause on the Z28.

I hope so!
CamaroScotty is offline  
Old 10-11-2010, 04:42 PM
  #74  
Registered User
 
Chevycobb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,272
As far as value, it is hard for me to say. I am still uncertain what the car looks like. I dont know what the engine will do, and I do not know what the suspension, interior(is this still being changed?), exhaust, tires, etc. will be.

At the same time, we can all assume what it has and if I were to vote on that it would probably be different. So at this time, I elect not to vote.

Last edited by Chevycobb; 10-11-2010 at 04:45 PM.
Chevycobb is offline  
Old 10-11-2010, 08:08 PM
  #75  
Registered User
 
SSPORT10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 527
Originally Posted by CamaroScotty
Wonder if GM will put a NO MARK UP clause on the Z28.

I hope so!
That will never happen and honestlly it should not be done! I am tired of greedy dealers, but if they mark them up, then just go on to the next dealer and pay MSRP. In the end the greedy dealers will either be stuck with the cars or be forced to sell them at sticker.
SSPORT10 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: $50 grand* for a Camaro Z28. Is that a good VALUE**?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:07 AM.